Japan has 13 operational F-35s, with nearly 150 more on order. The planes are based with the 302nd Squadron at the Misawa Air Base in Aomori, northern Japan.

A Japan Air Self-Defence Force spokesman has confirmed to Sputnik that one of its F-35s has gone missing with one pilot said to be on board. “It disappeared from radars,” the spokesman said, adding that a search for the plane is underway.

Earlier, Japanese national broadcaster NHK reported that an air force F-35A disappeared from radar screens during a routine training flight.

According to the military, ground control lost contact with the plane at around 7:27 pm on Tuesday, about 135 km northeast of Misawa city, during training. The plane is believed to have one pilot onboard.

Over a dozen Maritime Self-Defence Force patrol aircraft and escort vessels are engaged in a search operation, NHK said, with the local Coast Guard also deploying two patrol vessels to help in the search. Ten F-35As were delivered to the Misawa Air Base last year.

All JASDF F-35As Grounded

Later Tuesday, Japanese Defence Minister Takeshi Iwaya said that the air force would suspend flights of its remaining F-35As for the time being following the plane’s disappearance, Kyodo has reported.

Tokyo ordered a total of 42 F-35As in late 2011, with the existing order updated to include 63 more F-35As and 42 F-35Bs by late 2018, with Japan becoming the second-largest buyer of Lockheed Martin’s fifth-generation stealth fighter.

Last September, the US military grounded its entire fleet of F-35s in the wake of a Marine Corps F-35 crash in South Carolina. That incident followed reports in late 2017 that a US F-35 deployed in Okinawa, Japan lost part of its fuselage in mid-air during a routine training mission.

ALSO READ  Japan rules F-35 disappearance as ‘mystery’ after US fails find aircraft

The F-35 program is one of the most expensive defence projects in history, with a projected total cost of $1.5 trillion over its 55-year lifespan.

In addition to cost (currently ranging from $89.2-$115.5 million apiece), the plane has been criticised for a plethora of glitches and design flaws which continue to plague it over four years after its introduction with the US military in 2015.

Acting US Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan has reportedly described the plane as “f***ed up,” with President Donald Trump repeatedly criticising it as an example of Pentagon waste on the campaign trail.

Last month, a US defence spending watchdog complained that the new F-35s for the US Navy was nowhere near operational status, emphasizing that the plane was “not ready to face current or future threats” and could put US military personnel’s lives at risk.

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 2.1K
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    2.1K
    Shares

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

“The plane is believed to have one pilot onboard”
==> There are neither 2 seats versions, nor unmanned F-35…

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

“In addition to cost (currently ranging from $89.2-$115.5 million apiece)” ===> NOPE! This pricing is for Lockheed-Martin and Pratt&Whitney workshare alone! All other subcontractors have to be paid separately. At the present day, F-35A flyaway cost is $144M and is expected to fall to $135M in 2020, other versions are more expensive, thus, USAF is already willing to do cuts in purchases, moreover, FOC (full operational capability) won’t be gained before 2023-2025 and all the non-FOC deliveries will need upgrade. US militaries plan not to upgrade their 200 first delivered and keep these for training purposes only as additional upgrade… Read more »

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

“Acting US Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan has reportedly described the plane as “f***ed up,” with President Donald Trump repeatedly criticising it as an example of Pentagon waste on the campaign trail.” ===> Dassault should propose the Yankees to save the day! Rafale has already proved itself on par with F-22 and at entering S-300/400 areas without being noticed AT ALL. Moreover, we could perfectly modify the amphibius ships with C13-3 80m catapults and compressed air replacing steam, adding an angled deck as much as purveying a 280m/65,000t aircraft carrier for €2.3B only while Geralf Ford-class aircraft carriers cost $13B for… Read more »