The NATO alliance is moving ‘some personnel out of Iraq’ amid concerns for their security, an alliance official cited by Reuters has said.

“We are taking all precautions necessary to protect our people. This includes the temporary repositioning of some personnel to different locations both inside and outside of Iraq,” the official said.

The official added that the continued safety of NATO personnel was “paramount.”

On Monday, US Defence Secretary Mark Esper said the Pentagon has yet to make any decision on whether or not to withdraw troops from Iraq following a vote in Iraq’s parliament demanding their departure. Also Monday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley dismissed a draft letter said to have been sent “by mistake” by a senior US general to an Iraqi counterpart and circulated in the media which appeared to confirm that the US would be withdrawing its troops on the basis of Washington’s ‘respect for Iraqi sovereignty’.

On Tuesday, German media reported that the German Army planned to withdraw some of the troops it has stationed in Iraq, while warning that the withdrawal could result in the resurgence of the Daesh (ISIS)* terrorists.

Alliance members began to voice concerns over the security of their missions in the country on Saturday, a day after the US drone strike assassination of Iranian Revolutionary Guards Quds Force Commander Gen. Qasem Soleimani. The general’s killing sparked threats of retaliation by Iran and the powerful Baghdad-allied Iraqi Shia militia forces Soleimani worked with.

On Saturday, a spokesman said NATO had suspended all training activities, although its mission in the country was “continuing.” In the days that followed, Sweden, Denmark, and Latvia suspended their training missions with Iraqi forces.

ALSO READ  Iraqi gov't gets final say on US troops in Iraq: Pompeo

Iraqi military spokesman Abdel Karim Khalaf told Sputnik on Saturday that Iraq would maintain the capability to defend itself even if NATO suspended all its training activity in the country. He added that the government has already placed limits on the actions of US forces stationed in Iraq after the “stab in the back” assassination of Soleimani.

On Sunday, Iraq’s parliament voted to expel US troops from the country, and to put a formal end to Iraq’s participation in the US-led anti-Daesh coalition. The same day, President Trump said that the US would not leave Iraq until Baghdad paid the US back for the costs of building the Balad military base north of Baghdad. He also threatened to hit the country with sanctions, warning that they would be so tough they would “make Iranian sanctions look somewhat tame” by comparison.

NATO’s Iraq missions includes several hundred advisers and support personnel.

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    1
    Share

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

1
Discuss

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
enkidu gilgamesh Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
enkidu gilgamesh
Guest
enkidu gilgamesh

You could also say that the USA leaving some victims of expected revenge to prevent a bigger war, which may result in loss of most US bases in the Middle East.

By murdering General Soleimani, did Trump want to prevent Saudi Arabia from joining Iran?
https://enkidugilgamesh.wordpress.com/2020/01/07/by-murdering-general-soleimani-did-trump-want-to-prevent-saudi-arabia-from-joining-iran/