Former Indian corps commander Syed Ata Hasnain has admitted that Islamabad had defeated New Delhi in hybrid war.

“They [India] should learn from Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR),[the Pakistan military’s media wing], how to fight a “fifth-generation war”, Hasnain, a former Lieutenant General,  told a British think tank.

According to him, the ISPR had proved that media remains a highly effective tool in hybrid war, including the information conflict, in which Pakistan “showed great professional skills”.

Hasnain claimed that it’s impossible to win a traditional war on a battlefield in modern times, and that it took “even the United States” 18 years to realise the fact.

His remarks came a few days after the Pakistani Foreign Ministry stated that it has thoroughly investigated India’s dossier related to the 14 February Pulwama terror attack and has neither found any evidence of terror camps at the locations mentioned by New Delhi, nor of any person mentioned in the document that could be linked to the attack.

“While 54 detained individuals are being investigated, no details linking them to Pulwama have been found so far. Similarly, the 22 pin locations shared by India have been examined. No such camps exist. Pakistan is willing to allow visits, on request, to these locations”, the nation’s Foreign Ministry pointed out.

The ministry reiterated that additional information and documents from India would be essential to continue the process of investigation and that Pakistan remains committed to taking this process to its logical conclusion.

Last week, Pakistani President Arif Alvi accused India of having an “irresponsible” attitude and praised Islamabad’s immediate and effective response to what he described as “Indian aggression”.

“After the Pulwama attack, India blamed Pakistan without any evidence. India did not adhere to international laws and violated Pakistan’s airspace,” Alvi said, referring to the 14 February attack on an Indian security convoy in the Indian-controlled area of Kashmir by Pakistan-based Islamist militants, which claimed the lives of at least 40 security personnel.

ALSO READ  Russia, Iran to push Turkey to make final settlement on Idlib: source

Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), a Pakistan-based terror group, claimed responsibility for the attack and the Indian Air Force conducted an air strike on a JeM camp inside Pakistan on 26 February; Islamabad, in turn, claimed, that IAF aircraft never targeted the camp. The standoff escalated, resulting in a 27 February dogfight between the two countries’ warplanes.

 

 

This article first appeared in Sputnik News on March 30, 2019

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 202
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    202
    Shares

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Funny facts : journos from well known agencies like Reuters were prevented to reach the site. No problem if you hit MeT, LeT, Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas, Boko-Haram, Talibans, Hezbotox or any group : there is one jihad

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

All are legitimate targets, no discrimination must be done, just like cockroaches infestations. In fact, the error is to speak about the strikes you make : it gives them

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

an advertising they don’t deserve, pass attacks for a problem in gas network or whatever, and play dirty… Oooops, a 2000lbs JDAM lets a huge crater… then, strangely, for every dead you had,

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

advertising they don’t deserve

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

hit them secretly, but hit them really hard… for each dead, you burn 10 mosques and as much madrassas… guys with baclavas, police can’t find ’em…

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Do not arrest them, send ninjas, and moreover, go after those who pay, even if they are kings, princes, prez, etc…