The Syrian Arab Republic has accused the United States of interfering in the constitutional committee’s work and attempting to impose its own agenda, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement, according to SANA news agency.

“The US State Department’s statement on the Geneva meetings of the constitutional committee definitely confirms Washington’s attempts to meddle in other states’ affairs and impose its own agenda on the constitutional committee,” the document reads.

The Syrian Foreign Ministry emphasizes that the dialogue in Geneva is “inter-Syrian and no one has any right to meddle in it or back any side under any pretext.” The role of the United Nations, which is represented by the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy Geir Pedersen is just to “facilitate discussion in the committee,” the document says.

According to the Syrian ministry, “any views or statements of the US or other countries don’t have value and neither influence the constitutional committee’s work nor the nature, form and content of its dialogues.”

The US State Department stated on November 30 that the Syrian government’s delegation, which attended the second round of the committee’s consultations, requested preconditions which, according to Washington, “clearly violate the constitutional committee’s rules of procedure, and are a blatant attempt to delay the work of an important effort that is supported by both the Small Group and Astana Group.”

The second meeting of the Syrian constitutional committee in Geneva, which ended this week, failed to yield any fruit. The representatives of the government and the opposition, who attended it, were unable to agree on its agenda and hold a general meeting.

ALSO READ  Syrian Army uncovers large arms cache with western-made weapons


Source: TASS

Share this article:
  • 1

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2019-12-02 10:02

Last February, Pompeo said that USA was ready to back Assad’s presidency… For sure there’d be some pre-conditions but… Remember that when Mao implied in an agreement with Nixon, Yankees left Vietnam…
What was sought from the start was China’s neutrality in the Cold-War… What is REALLY sought here is Syria’s neutrality in the Mid-East cold war… Assad has real means of selling his neutrality for a very very good price.
I really don’t get why Assad doesn’t considers Real-Politik, any way, Arab nationalism is dead since Nasser is gone, this is ridiculous to act brain-dead.

2019-12-03 06:06
Reply to  Daeshbags-Sux

“inter Syrian” does not include “”the United States” interfering in the inter Syrian constitutional committee’s work and attempting to impose its own agenda””. I believe you are assuming different from the stated article of facts. You really should not project your wrong wishes for reality based fact/s, have you no shame?