Two US military bases in Iraq were attacked early on 8 January with Iranian missiles in an act of retaliation for Washington’s operation that killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani on 3 January in Baghdad.

In his address to the nation, US President Donald Trump said that no US military personnel were hurt in the Iranian missile attack on its bases in Iraq on 8 January, while the bases themselves sustained “minimal” damage. He noted that this was due to precautions that were taken, the “dispersal of forces”, and an early warning system.

The POTUS further announced that the US would impose “new powerful economic sanctions” against Iran in light of the attack against the American military bases. He added that the sanctions would remain until Iran “changes its behaviour” on the international arena. The US president stated that he would ask NATO to be “much more involved” in the process in the Middle East.

While Trump didn’t explicitly promise any action against Tehran apart from sanctions over the missile attack on 8 January, he put great emphasis on the modernisation that the US military has undergone under his presidency. The POTUS namely boasted that US Armed Forces possess “big and accurate” missiles, but added that he hopes not to use them against Iran.

“The fact that we have this great military and equipment, however, does not mean we have to use it. We do not want to use it. American strength, both military and economic, is the best deterrent”, he said.

Instead, Trump suggested reaching a new deal with Iran that would make “the world a safer and more peaceful place”, while at the same time benefiting the Islamic Republic itself.

ALSO READ  Senior officer in IRGC killed in northwestern Syria

“We want you to have a future, and a great future – one that you deserve. One of prosperity at home and harmony with the nations of the world. The US is ready to embrace peace with all who seek it”, POTUS said.

Trump also commented on the US killing of Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani, claiming that the US had information about him planning attacks for 4 January. The president added that this became the driving force behind the decision to kill the Iranian general.

The decision to assassinate the Quds Force leader, however, led to a major escalation in tensions between the US and Iran in the Middle East, as the latter vowed to retaliate for what it called a “terrible crime” and an act of state “terrorism”.

The retaliation came five days later when Tehran fired dozens of missiles at military facilities in Erbil and the Ayn al-Asad Air Base in Iraq, which is utilised by US forces. Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei called the missile barrage a “slap” in the US’ face and hinted that more attacks may follow. Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, in turn, called the missile attack on 8 January “legitimate self-defence” in response to the US killing of Soleimani.

 

Source: Sputnik

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Member
Regular
Commenter
Upvoted
Yona

Didn’t donald trump start this on.

Franklin Paredes
Guest
Franklin Paredes

It is better to see the news with no emotions, or bias, but with objectivity, as far as the Bible concerns, it is predicted that Elam will be 1. destroyed and later 2. reborn, believers in Jesus living in Iran are ready for this to happen, at any time 1. destroyed, Jeremiah 49:36 And I will bring upon Aelam the four winds from the four corners of heaven, and I will disperse them toward all these winds; and there shall be no nation [to] which they shall not come– [even] the outcasts of Aelam. 49:37 And I will put them… Read more »

Gryz
Guest
Gryz

“Mine is big, folks” almost Verbatim. Just stick to porn-stars, man…