The US accused Russia of trying to use the UN Security Council meeting “to weaken the credibility of the OPCW and its findings” on the alleged chemical attacks on the Syrian city of Douma in 2018, speaking at the UNSC meeting in New York City on Monday.

US acting deputy to the UN, Cherith Norman Chalet, blamed Russia for “brazen disinformation campaign waged in advance of the anticipated release of the OPCW investigation and identification teams’ first report.”

“We must defend the credibility and the findings of the OPCW and the UN from disinformation,” she added and emphasised that “the United States stands firmly behind the OPCW Fact Finding Missions (FFM) March 1st, 2019 report.”

Earlier, the Russian side stated that alleged chemical attacks on Douma were staged by the White Helmets and the chlorine displayed as evidence had been placed by militants for provocative purposes.

The Security Council meeting was called upon by Russian Permanent Representative Vasily Nebenzya to discuss the report prepared by Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) into the alleged chemical attack on Douma in 2018.

 

Source: Ruptly

Advertisements
Share this article:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
ALSO READ  Unknown aircraft bomb Syria's gas fields in Homs

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

11
Discuss

avatar
3 Comment threads
8 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
Daeshbags-SuxKandinski Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

There is currently no credibility in OPCW’s Douma report. Thanks to outside interference presumably from US and other nations that participated in missile attacks on Syria. Presumably to justify these acts of aggressions. US acting deputy to the UN, Cherith Norman Chale must read https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

I bet that even Cherith Norman Chalet doesn’t believes what she says, just like only total idiots believed the Houthis did the attacks on Aramco or that Iran didn’t shot down the Ukrainian airliner for 4 days… Even OPCW internal “cables” say the Douma report was staged.
This is the great point of recouping through OSINT nowadays : we don’t drink the Kool-Aid so easily…

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@death 2, brain dead like Cherith Norman Chalet believe their own cràp.

And they repeat it even when OSINT Q1 speak against it. Because they and their masters know that they have the interpretational sovereignty via their control over Western MSM. And they are right – even after 100 years the Western public still believes in their WW I crapaganda against Imperial Germany. Greetings from Wilson’s, world’s first ministry of information. Goebbels was only a copy cat.

Member
Regular
Upvoted
Commenter
Alicia Keez

Of course the US would say this because it is the US and the rebels they support in Syria that would benefit from this staged attack. But anyone with any amount of brains can see there was no logic to Assad using CW. why? Because he had already taken most of the territory, he was winning the battle and why do a one off attack? Only stupid people would believe that Assad did this.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

In fact, they simply go on with the narrative in order to not apologise, the same way it goes for the WH : don’t worry, they perfectly know that WH are roaches and how they sücked by backing these critters, but they consider saying “yup, we sucked at believing the WH crapaganda” as a sign of weakness, so the narrative will be maintained no matter what happens.

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@death 2, they are too brain dead to realize they were fùcked by critters.

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@Alicia Keez, but Western MSM do not tell their general public addicts to use any amount of brain and to ask cui bono first. Woodrow Wilson’s Propaganda Machine Changed International Journalism. The media of this world are still feeling the impact of an executive order signed in 1917 that created the ‘first ministry of information’. Cherith Norman Chalet has grown up brainwashed and thus brain dead. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-woodrow-wilsons-propaganda-machine-changed-american-journalism-180963082/

Kandinski
Guest
Kandinski

You can eat s**t to a certain point.

Daeshbags-Sux
Guest
Daeshbags-Sux

You mean English cooking?

Member
Famed Member
Master
Commenter
Upvoted
Stern Daler

@death 2, yes but it only refers to the south English cooking that luckily makes them brain dead and has lead to the Brexit of the US sub from the EU shores.