BEIRUT, LEBANON (12:00 P.M.) – The Pentagon issued a formal warning on Tuesday to the Russian Federation against tampering with the evidence at the chemical weapons attack site in the provincial capital of Aleppo.

“We caution Russia against tampering with another suspected chemical weapons attack site and urge Russia to secure the safety of the OPCW inspectors so these allegations can be investigated in a fair and transparent manner,” Pentagon spokesman Commander Sean Robertson said.

Last week, the Syrian and Russian governments accused the rebel forces of launching chlorine shells into the western districts of Aleppo; this resulted in nine civilians killed and over 100 wounded.

The Pentagon official also took the time to caution Russia against launching a new military operation in Idlib.

“We continue to engage the Russian government and military at senior levels to make clear that an offensive in Idlib would represent a reckless escalation of the conflict,” Robertson said.

 

Advertisements
Share this article:
  • 71
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    71
    Shares
ALSO READ  Benghazi-based Libyan gov't sends first official delegation to Syria

Notice: All comments represent the view of the commenter and not necessarily the views of AMN.

All comments that are not spam or wholly inappropriate are approved, we do not sort out opinions or points of view that are different from ours.

This is a Civilized Place for Public Discussion

Please treat this discussion with the same respect you would a public park. We, too, are a shared community resource — a place to share skills, knowledge and interests through ongoing conversation.

These are not hard and fast rules, merely guidelines to aid the human judgment of our community and keep this a clean and well-lighted place for civilized public discourse.

Improve the Discussion

Help us make this a great place for discussion by always working to improve the discussion in some way, however small. If you are not sure your post adds to the conversation, think over what you want to say and try again later.

The topics discussed here matter to us, and we want you to act as if they matter to you, too. Be respectful of the topics and the people discussing them, even if you disagree with some of what is being said.

Be Agreeable, Even When You Disagree

You may wish to respond to something by disagreeing with it. That’s fine. But remember to criticize ideas, not people. Please avoid:

  • Name-calling
  • Ad hominem attacks
  • Responding to a post’s tone instead of its actual content
  • Knee-jerk contradiction

Instead, provide reasoned counter-arguments that improve the conversation.

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Jonah
Guest
Jonah

How convenient. US knows the tricks quite well obviously. Perhaps they’ve done something similar in the past?

NZLex
Guest
NZLex

Classic predictive programming – the empire “warns” baddie country A not to do something (which country A had no intention of doing), then later claims baddie country A “ignored the warnings” and did baddie thing anyway (in fact empire themselves did baddie thing – alternatively baddie thing never happened). Later empire points to “warning” as “proof” that baddie country did baddie thing – and naturally, being a baddie country they are assumed to do baddie things by stupefied programmed serfs of empire (alternatively they don’t believe/care but are too sensible to speak of such dangerous matters).